Battery Ageing Model

Kia Soul EV Forum

Help Support Kia Soul EV Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
guiacan said:
New data points for the number junkies
...
Great. Thanks.

To get a better comparison with other users could you provide a bit more data.
How old is your car? When did you buy it?
How fast do you drive, how hard do you brake?
How hot does your area get in summer? How often do you use the AC.?
How cold does your area get in winter? How often did you use the heater?
How flat / mountainous is you daily drive?
 
To get a better comparison with other users could you provide a bit more data.
How old is your car? When did you buy it?
The car arrived on the dealer lot in february 2017 where it was used as a demo car until I bought it in october 2017 with 7000km on the odo.

How fast do you drive, how hard do you brake?
For the daily commute, I rarely drive above 80km/h. Braking goes with the trafic :) but I try to maximise the use of the B mode so I mostly use the brake only for the last few km/h.

How hot does your area get in summer? How often do you use the AC.?
I saw over 40C a few time this summer which is really unusual. The AC was used a lot this summer. Normal temperature is about 25C in the summer.

How cold does your area get in winter? How often did you use the heater?
The lowest I saw was -33C. Normal temperature in the winter is anywhere between -5C to -25C. I use the heater for 6 months in a year.

How flat / mountainous is you daily drive?
Mostly flat
 
-
guiacan thanks for the extra info. am hoping we see a pattern that helps explain why some cars are degrading so much faster than others.

and now for the bad news. More reports of severe degradation -

-

From Quebec - MY2015 , 87,000km, SOH at 57 % reported on : Facebook Soul EV - Quebec Forum

From Jeju - MY2014 , 120,000 km, SOH at 58.2 % reported on : Korean EV User Forum

From Germany - MY2015 , 105,000km, SOH at 69.7 % reported on : German Soul EV thread - GoingElectric.DE
-
 
.
Just had my car in for 105000km service and got new SOH reading from the KDS instrument:
Odometer: 106736km
SOH: 97.5%

My own readings from OBD:
Max det: 13.1
Min det: 11.4
Avg SOH: 97.8%
 
Jeju,
My Soul is down to 79.1% SOH. I have the OBD installed running Torque Pro. I am willing to start collecting weekly data for entry into your spreadsheet if you would like to have my data. Reading this thread, it looks like most have not experienced degradation.

Let me know exactly what data I need to collect weekly from Torque Pro to provide, and if I can enter the data myself.

I have 32,000 miles and live in a warm area (Pasadena) of Southern California.

RubberToe
 
RubberToe said:
...My Soul is down to 79.1% SOH. ..
Hi RubberToe thanks for posting your data.
You will be able to get a free battery replacement once your degradation reaches 70% SOH.
I don't know why your car is degrading much faster than any of the cars reporting here.
I doubt Pasadena is that much hotter than where I live. ( Daily Summer Temps - Max 35C , Min 28C)
It is temps above 45C that destroy the battery fast. = Phoenix Arizona.

I think it will be 2 or 3 months before you get low enough to get the battery replacement, so am grateful you offered to take some OBDII data.
None of the regulars here have much degradation from usable capacity so we have nothing to explain what is going on.
There's about 20 cars with data from the last 3 years. Average odometer 48,500km. Average age 30 months. Average deterioration SOH = 100%
Note SOH = 100% means that the 10% buffer at the top has been lost over the years.

Originally it was only the Phoenix cars that were dying but now there are a lot of cars reporting battery problems at about 100,000km.
Possible reasons - driving fast, Charging to 100% SOC, Fast charging all the time ??? We don't know.

The first data I would like to check from your car is the 96 cell voltages. Could you have a look when the car is fully charged and see if one cell is way different from the rest. If so that cell has probably failed, and that is what is causing the problem.
 
Here is what I have so far. I didn't have the extended PIDs loaded for individual cell voltages, but I have that installed now and will head down to the car and see what they are. Can you tell from the below screen if there is something I should zero in on? Cell #73?

2018_09_02%20overall%20cell_zpsj9g3ydxj.jpg
 
JejuSoul said:
RubberToe said:
...My Soul is down to 79.1% SOH. ..
I doubt Pasadena is that much hotter than where I live. ( Daily Summer Temps - Max 35C , Min 28C)
It is temps above 45C that destroy the battery fast. = Phoenix Arizona.

A couple weeks ago we had a week of daily high temperatures of 37 C, it hit 43 one day I believe.

RT
 
JejuSoul said:
Possible reasons - driving fast, Charging to 100% SOC, Fast charging all the time ??? We don't know.

I don't typically drive over 65mph, not sure about the wife who has been driving mostly the last year.

She gets home from work and charges to 100% every night, parked in garage underground, her commute is about 25 miles each way.

Very unlikely the problem is DCFC, at least in my case. I probably only DCFC a total of <15 times in 4 years. Only did a single trip that required DCFC, that was 120 miles one way.

RT
 
RubberToe said:
..All 96 cell voltages are reading either 4.1 or 4.08. I'm at 99.5% charge I believe...
Okay, we can rule out a single cell failure. Your battery has lost a lot of capacity due to deterioration.
DCFC doesn't seem to be an issue. So it's likely heat, or charging to 100% SOC, or both.


If the car now has a 70 mile range and has to do a 50 mile commute, I can understand the need to charge to 100% SOC.
But once you get a new battery and the car has a 100 mile range, I would stick to 80% charging.

The most likely damage to the battery comes when the battery is above 45C and has no chance to cool down.
This may happen if the car is driven fast for 25 miles, and then parked in the hot sun for 8 hours.
It is the power needed for driving that causes the battery to overheat.
The problem is the cooling fan does not work when the car is off.
Once parked If the battery got too hot, it will stay too hot. This is a big difference between a Soul EV and a T esla.

The next data to check with Torque is battery temps. How hot is your battery at the start of the day, How hot after a 25 mile drive. How hot after being left parked in the sun for 8 hours.

On my car the battery temps stay around 30C day and night for the entire summer. I only drive about 40km a day, at about 50km/h.
I always L2 charge to 80%. I always try to park in the shade. This temperature 30C does not seem to damage the battery.
 
Jeju,
Just took a test drive logging data, but saw that only GPS data is being logged. I figured out how to add additional data points for logging, and will do another test run to verify. Added battery temps to the logged data. Anything else you want let me know. I'll do a 25 mile test drive just to see what the battery temps do. It is fairly cool here this morning, so we are not going to get much valuable data.

I'll post later about the use case that I believe may be causing the degradation. Your post right above is right on track.

RT
 
Ok, data logging is working, and I can capture any/all of the required data points at 1Hz rate. I just took a test drive of about 20 miles. Battery temp started at 25C and went up to 27C over a 26 minute drive. My SOH remained at 79.1% for the entire drive as expected.

The use case Jeju mentioned is this one: "The most likely damage to the battery comes when the battery is above 45C and has no chance to cool down. This may happen if the car is driven fast for 25 miles, and then parked in the hot sun for 8 hours. It is the power needed for driving that causes the battery to overheat. The problem is the cooling fan does not work when the car is off. Once parked If the battery got too hot, it will stay too hot."

This is exactly the use case! My wife commutes 25 miles in the morning, then the car sits in the sun for 8-9 hours. On the way home she is often going 75 mph.

Not clear if I am going to be able to capture a log of this, since the Torque Pro is installed on my cell phone and not hers. I will be able to check the stats periodically though and monitor her degradation on her commute versus my degradation on my commute. If she degrades it but I don't then that isolates it. Note that I park at work in a parking garage at all times, and drive slower too, much shorter commute.

Big picture question: If Kia is aware of this use case causing battery degradation, have they changed the functioning of the system to alleviate this in the future? For example, does a new battery provided following a replacement still not do this: The problem is the cooling fan does not work when the car is off?

I would think that if Kia were aware of this specific degradation issue, they would alert owners to the issue.

RT
 
Not clear if I am going to be able to capture a log of this, since the Torque Pro is installed on my cell phone and not hers. I will be able to check the stats periodically though and monitor her degradation on her commute versus my degradation on my commute. If she degrades it but I don't then that isolates it. Note that I park at work in a parking garage at all times, and drive slower too, much shorter commute.

The best time to check the battery temp is right after when your wife comes home. By that time, the car has gone through the morning commute, sitting idle at work, and the evening commute at 75mph. The temps should compound as JejuSoul mentioned, since the battery never has a chance to cool down. Jump in the car and check Torque. Please share a screenshot that looks like this (from the 1st page of Torque):

8dCeIK.md.png


You can see the battery temp on the top right corner. Make sure the car is on before you use Torque.
 
Kish said:
...The best time to check the battery temp is right after when your wife comes home...
Agreed.

There are some more numbers about the battery temperatures here - TMS Behavior

And the reason for never allowing your battery to get to 122F (50C) very often.

In particular see the USABC_Final_Report_June_2014 (for SK Innovation E400 see printed pages E21-E23, on screen pages 145-147)

2rrmdee.jpg
 
-
Have been collecting some reports from Quebec about battery degradation. will post shortly.

But first. The city with the fastest degradation on EVs without a liquid cooled TMS is Phoenix, Arizona.
All Soul EVs in Phoenix, Arizona have required battery replacements within 3 years. (Often faster than this)
The reason is heat. Daytime summer temps in Phoenix, Arizona can go above 45C.
This destroys the battery fast. Details at - Arizona SOUL EV Heat testing

Here's one more statistic from Phoenix, Arizona.
2016 Soul EV, 21,568 miles, GOM at 100% showed 40 miles.

 
-
I am going to compare the battery deterioration of Soul EVs in Quebec against the cars on Jeju Island.
It seems like cars in Quebec are suffering more deterioration.

As of August 1st 2018 there are 1,912 Soul Evs registered on Jeju Island.
As of June 30th 2018 there are 1,149 Soul Evs registered in Quebec.

Jeju Island has a much warmer climate than Quebec particularly in winter. Jeju Island does not get extreme heat or cold.

My car is 40 months old has driven 50,248km and is now at 99.2% SOH. A friend's car here has roughly the same stats.
My car was checked at Kia yesterday. The Torque data shows the exact same 99.2% as the official KDS.
The formula we use in Torque is 110 - (Max + Min) /2.





If my car represents an average car on Jeju then these cars will reach 70% deterioration after about 12 years and 180,000km.
I will not get a free battery replacement under warranty.

I chatted to the Kia tech at my local garage about deterioration. He guesses most cars here will need a battery replacement between 150,000km and 200,000km. He has had 1 car that came in with 150,000km and 68% SOH. Currently my garage does not have the equipment to do the replacements. They will buy it next year.

As reported earlier there was another car on the island that got a battery replacement.
From Jeju - MY2014 , 120,000 km, SOH at 58.2 % reported on : Korean EV User Forum

The cars that are driven much further each day seem to deteriorate much faster than the average. ( In distance terms, obviously time wise it is much shorter)

------------------------------------------------

And now for Quebec. There's a facebook thread here discussing battery problems. :- Quebec Soul EV Forum on Facebook
There seem to be many users reporting range loss and lower battery health.

Summarized by Siluzium -
So in summary :

Jonathan's Soul EV is a MY2015 with 75 000 km, owns it since December 2014. Mostly charges on L2, rarely on L3. On summer, consumption is aroung 14-16 kWh/100km. Range was 150-160km (summer 2015 and 2016), 130-140km (summer 2017), 120-130km (Spring 2018) and 100-110km (summer 2018). Official SOH reading at 91% this spring. Official reading on Aug 26 = 71.6%. Dealer says he has to wait until it drops below 70% to do something. He was wondering if it's normal degradation or not.

As I said in the comment in the tread, this is the kind of numbers that I am experiencing (however I'm currently around 130km on the highway — well, before vacations. I'll go to my parents tomorrow I'll let you know). GOM was at 189 I think when I received the car, and driving in the city and highway (100 km/h) we could get around 170 km at the beginning, in the summer. More like 145 km in 2016, 140 km in 2017, 130 km this year.

At the beginning, Nathanaël wonders why even in the first summer he couldn't get further, extrapolating theoretical driving range using 27 kWh as a base. Natanaël's Soul EV GOM was at 212 km at the beginning and could travel easily 190 km (note: I think it was probably in the city mostly). Summer consumption is around 11-13 kWh/100km.

Miriam's Soul EV has the same situation as Jonathan. She was waiting to drop below 70% as well.

Nicolas's Soul EV (he has the lowest VIN number I've seen, lives near me) is at 93.4%. He could do easily 160 km in 2016, now he can drive 125 km if he's careful.

Claude asked how Jonathan charged the car. Jonathan charges mostly on L2 as previously said. Before he was charging aroung 80% and 100%. Now he charges at 100%. Claude seems to imply that charging at 100% may accelere degradation.

François Morin also has similar numbers, MY2016 (a bit newer than mine), 70 000km. He says since the last BMS update, the last 15 km is more predictable (decreases more linearly than before).

Phil Duf (lives near me too), MY15 137 000 km SOH 64%, 80-90km range. His daily commute is 83 km. Under investigation during all summer, now turtle mode starts at 35 % SOC. Kia Canada is aware.

Jonathan asks what's the price of the Soul EV battery, no one really knows. Only reference I found is on KiaPartsNow website, and may not reflect the real price.

Guillaume Godbout got his battery changed, was below SOH 60%. One year later with the new battery SOH is still at 100%. He now avoids DCQC like hell, just in case. Philippe Tremblay wonders if it's a good thing that Soul EV charges so fast (read: unlike L eaf) no matter what, and if this could degrade the battery under some conditions.

Yvon's Soul EV can do about 130 km as well (MY16 titanium like us, a few months younger). Did a lot of QC, ~250.

Francois Boucher says that some battery degrade even if they dont do QC (like base models), so QC may not be the cause.

I have plenty of data from 1 car in Quebec. User Siluzium. 36 months old, 50,000km, SOH 92%
He is a regular user on the Quebec Forum and he thinks his car is average for his area.






Here's a comparison of the data from my car and Siluzium's in Quebec.
My trend line in blue is above the warranty line in red, and seems to be getting better (new points are above - pushing my trend line up)
His trend line in green is belowthe warranty line in red, and seems to be getting worse (new points are below - pushing his trend line down)
Note the trend line in yellow is for the Phoenix cars. These cars die early in the extreme heat of the Arizona desert.



The big question is why? Why is Quebec doing worse than Jeju, when cold weather is supposedly good for battery longevity.
It would be great to have more data from Norway. That is the place with the most Soul EVs. But there is very little data.
 
-
Here's a graph showing how the 20 cars I'm monitoring are behaving. These cars are driving about 50,000km in the first 3 or 4 years and losing about 10% of the battery health. That equates to the buffer. Hence after 3 or 4 years usable capacity remains close to 100% SOH.



We already have a climate zone outlier. Phoenix, Arizona. All 14 cars there have failed. Reason = extreme heat.
It seems we have a second climate zone outlier. Quebec. Possible reason = extreme cold.

Siluzium said:
There is around 10 people waiting for battery replacement for their Soul EV in Quebec, some are waiting for a replacement since this summer. It's very long time. Some have GOM of 75km with SOH less than 60%
 
.
This summer and fall there was a campaign on the 30kWh Soul here in Sweden, where Kia offered a 60,000 SEK (¨€6,000) rebate on top of the 60,000 SEK state incentive. In Juli I asked my dealer for a trade in and got a deal I couldn't reject. Took a long time, but this week I finally picked up my 2019 Soul EV. :D

Here is the complete deterioration log:



One note about the 4 dips on the Min% graph: They all occurred when the charge was interrupted just around the SOC when the deterioration values were to be updated. So if you have similar outliers in the lower values, they are not to be trusted.
 
-
Thanks for all the data Elmil. Good luck with your new car.
Your old one is the best we have data for!
 
Back
Top